
Faculty Council Meeting
250 Student Union
October 14, 1997
Minutes
President Halligan called the meeting to order with the following
members present: Ackerson, Arquitt, Bertholf, Bice, Bierman, Buchanan,
Cole, Dawson, Edgley, Farr, Finn, Gedra, Horn, Hsu, Kimbrell, Krenzer,
Lawry, Locy, Martin, Miller, Moder, Montgomery, Richards, Robinson,
Schwarz, Scott, Sisson, Warde, and Wilkinson. Also present: Birdwell,
Cortez, Eastman, Hays, Hoffman, Holmes, Keener, Knottnerus, Marks,
Matoy, Minson, Mitchell, Najd, Vitek, Vuong, and Watkins. Absent:
Smith
HIGHLIGHTS
- My Role In The New Executive Vice President Administrative Structure
- Prescription Card Update
- Report of Status of Faculty Council Recommendations
- Reports of Standing Committees
- Academic Standards and Policies
- Recommendation - Change in How Grade Point Average is Accumulated in Establishing the Eligibility of Part-time Students
for the President's and Dean's Honor Rolls
- Recommendation - Preparation of Common Exams for Multiple
Sections of the Same Course with Multiple Instructors
- Budget
- Campus Facilities, Safety, and Security
- Faculty
- Long-Range Planning
- Retirement and Fringe Benefits
- Student Affairs and Learning Resources
- Reports of Liaison Representatives
- Athletic Council
- Research Council
- Student Publications
- Emeriti Association
- Graduate Student Association
- Student Government Association
- New Business
[ PAGE 1 ] [ Page 2 ]
Dr. Buchanan moved the approval of the appointment of Kenneth Bierman to
fill the Group III Physical Sciences position left vacant by Khaled
Gasem's resignation. Dr. Warde seconded the motion. Dr. Buchanan said
that the bylaws prescribe that in the case of a vacancy a person is
appointed to fill the position until the next regularly scheduled
election. Motion passed. Dr. Warde moved acceptance of the September
9, 1997, Minutes. Dr. Lawry seconded the motion. Dr. Bertholf pointed
out a correction on page 6 under GSA report. Troy Pierce is Immediate
Past President not the Vice President as stated. The Minutes were
approved. Dr. Warde moved acceptance of the, October 14, 1997, Agenda.
Dr. Moder seconded. The Agenda was approved.
Dr. Vitek's first duty is to be Dr. Keener's deputy. This entails
representing Dr. Keener at many different kinds of meetings. He has
recently been made chair of a committee to look into term limits for
administrators. A new office flow chart shows the Honors Director, the
Director of University Academic Services, the Director of University
Assessment, and Student Services Director for student athletes all
report to him. He will also be in charge of the Instruction Council
which will replace the old curriculum committee and will have a new
wider range of activities. The Curriculum Committee just accepted
changes in the curriculum voted on them and passed them along. The
Instruction Council will consider questions like what should web based
curriculum look like and what constitutes a 16 hour commitment for one
credit hour for a web based course. The Instruction Council is made up
of the Associate Deans in all the colleges and a few other people and is
the place that many of the questions about instruction and curriculum
can be addressed. The General Education Council will also be headed by
the Dr. Vitek. The General Education Council will continue to update
the list of General Education Courses and to look at what General
Education is and how it needs to be changed. The Academic Appeals Board
will also report to him. The Regents Professor committee will also be
chaired by Dr. Vitek. This committee has just completed a new check
list on how to become a Regents Professor and what needs to be done to
renew a Regents Professor appointment. Dr. Vitek will also chair the
University Assessment Committee. Assessment must be taken very
seriously since it is mandated by the NCA. It has been kept in the
background but must now be brought into the foreground in order to get
the evidence that is needed to document our effectiveness. He will also
be a member of the Honorary Degree Committee. This committee is looking
for good people to nominate for an honorary degree. Dr. Vitek is the
university's representative to the Articulation Committee for the
OSRHE. This committee has created a web page giving an equivalence
matrix for the one and two thousand level courses in the State System.
This allows a person to determine how a course from a different
university will transfer before enrolling in the course. Most
complaints that come to either the President or Executive Vice President
about teaching, or any other problems in the university are referred to
him. Dr. Vitek views the position as one of service to faculty,
students and administrators in terms of getting the correct policies in
place and carefully handling complaints as they arise in order to make
this a good environment for our students. Dr. Lawry asked about a
proposal last year to do something programmatic in terms of faculty
development. Dr. Vitek said that it had come up in this mornings staff
meeting and would be part of his duties. Dr. Halligan pointed out that
Dr. Keener is an Executive Vice President and that is significantly
different than being a Provost. The President has an ever-increasing
obligation to do fund raising and those responsibilities take him away
from campus regularly and when the President is gone the EVP is the
senior officer of the university and makes a lot of decisions.
Ms. Matoy distributed a handout summarizing the financial status and
possible changes in the prescription card plan which was implemented
July 1, 1995. This information has also been posted to the bulletin
boards. This plan has been well received by most employees. During the
past year the Prescription Card Service has incurred a 32% increase in
total amount paid, a 17% increase in average amount paid/claim and a 21%
increase in amount paid per month per member which out paces the normal
medical inflation rate of about 8%. Since the OSU/A&M Health Care Plan
is self-funded an increase in claims must result in an increase in
premiums. Some changes are being considered for Jan. 1, 1998 in order
to minimize the increase in health care premiums July 1, 1998. These
changes are: 1. Change the maximum allowable cost to the price of the
generic drug equivalent. 2. Add an option to purchase drugs by mail.
The centralized data bank to keep track of all current drug use would
still be in effect. 3. Increase the minimum co-pay to $10 a
prescription from the present minimum of $5. 4. Limit the maximum
refill quantity on local sales to 34 days but allow 100 day refills by
mail order. If all the above changes were implemented, PCS estimates
the plan would save approximately $488,000 next year. Please send any
comments to one of the following members of the Health Care Committee:
Ed Arquitt, Leo Blakley, Carol Bradley, Greg Fox, Clyde Knight, Steven
Marks, Bob Oehrtman, Helmer Sorenson, or Sharon Whitney. Mr. Locy asked
about the number of people in the system. Ms. Matoy said that there is
a slight increase in the number of people covered. Dr. Halligan pointed
out that if all these options are implemented then the costs would be
20% lower but spending is running 32% higher. Is this wise? Ms Matoy
said that this is a midyear change and other changes would be considered
for July 1. However, Health Care International is currently analyzing
all of the claims that have been processed in the past two years to see
if there are any preventative measures that could give big savings.
Stillwater Medical Center was approached about reducing the PPO costs to
those offered to the State System. They immediately agreed to give the
Cimarron Medical Plan a deeper discount. The Health Care Committee is
currently monitoring the PPO plan. Dr. Lawry asked if it could be shown
that ordering a 100 day supply from a local seller was cheaper than mail
order would it be possible to wave the local limit? Ms. Matoy replied
that she did not know if there would be an appeal process or not. Dr.
Krenzer pointed out that the limit of 34 days places a real hardship on
people that are traveling for extended periods of time. Ms. Matoy
suggested using mail order and said that this has been one of the major
complaints about the plan.
President Halligan distributed a report on the status of the current
recommendations and on the disposition of former recommendations.
94-12-01-SALR Composition of Future Information Technology Committee:
Under review. Some input regarding committee charge and membership has
been received from the Deans, and Drs. Moretti and Buchanan. Final
draft is being prepared for final reviews.
96-12-04-FAC Changes in Appendix D: Under review. Legal Counsel has
reviewed. Dr. Keener will work with Legal Counsel to draft wording
changes to more clearly delineate the role of Ombuds and provide
additional specifics regarding membership to the Informal Review
Committee. Requires Board approval.
97-02-02-ADHOC Patent Policy 1-0202: Under review. Dr. Collins is
coordinating review by Research Council, Dean's Council, and Legal
Counsel. Draft including incorporated changes from initial reviews
will require another round of reviews. Final revisions require Board
approval.
97-03-02-FAC Faculty Appointment Periods: This recommendation is not
accepted, in that there is an objective to have similar faculty on the
same appointment periods. Those faculty currently on a 10-month
appointment will be allowed to continue.
97-04-03-ASP Guidelines for Scheduling Common Evening and Final Exams:
Under review. Dr. Vitek is coordinating this review with the
Registrar and is interacting with the FC Academic Standards and Policies
Committee on this issue. Draft revisions are being considered by the
committee.
97-04-04-ASP Guidelines for Requesting Common Evening and Final Exams:
Under review. Dr. Vitek is coordinating this review with the Registrar
and is interacting with the FC Academic Standards and Policies Committee
on this issue. Draft revisions are being considered by the committee.
97-09-01-FAC Policy and Procedure Letter on Reappointment, Promotion and
Tenure: Under review. September 9, FC approved the draft P&P as
revised by the Faculty Committee. The draft has been forwarded for
review, to include Deans Council.
97-09-02-FAC Return of Policy and Procedure Letter on Reappointment,
Promotion and Tenure to Faculty Council Before Action by the President:
Pending review of draft P&P Letter.
97-10-01-ASP Change in How Grade Point Average is Accumulated in
Establishing the Eligibility of Part-time Students for the President's
and Dean's Honor Rolls: To President Halligan.
97-10-02-ASP Preparation of Common Exams for Multiple Sections of the
Same Course with Multiple Instructors: To President Halligan.
The AS&P committee brought two recommendations for consideration. The
first, Change in How Grade Point Average is Accumulated in Establishing
the Eligibility of Part-time Students for the President's and Dean's
Honor Rolls, stems from a recommendation the committee brought to FC
last spring. One of the components of the previous recommendation was
that a new recognition, "Honor Roll" be established for part-time
students. For various reasons that recommendation was tabled. The
committee has dropped the idea of establishing a new recognition since
its members felt that a new recognition could lead to ambiguities
relative to the various honor rolls and that it would lessen the
distinction of the President's and Dean's Honor rolls. Dr. Horn moved
that: The Faculty Council recommends to President Halligan that: 1.
The manner in which grade point average of part-time students is
calculated in establishing their eligibility for recognition on the
President's or Dean's Honor Roll be changed so that credit hours used
for honor roll designation (i.e., minimum of 12 credit hours during the
most recent consecutive semesters of enrollment) are not used in
succeeding designations. Credit hours used for honor roll designation
should be based on distinct blocks of 12 credit hours or more. Once a
designation of honor roll is made for a student, the "slate should be
wiped clean" and a new accumulation of hours should begin. 2. If and
when part-time students reach full-time status, credit hours previously
earned by part-time students should not be included in this
calculation. Dr. Horn gave an example showing how the current rules
allow a part-time student to be included on the President's or Dean's
Honor Roll many more times than a full-time student making exactly the
same grades. Dr. Ackerson asked if a student accumulates 12 hours but
does not make the honor roll then is a line drawn so that the student
must start over on a new 12 hour block or can some of those hours be
used in a subsequent calculation. Dr. Eastman replied that as long as
no designation is met the appropriate hours can be used in subsequent
calculations. A "rolling" calculation is used until a designation is
reached. Mr. Najd stated that it is unfair to lose the part-time hours
when a student becomes full-time. Dr. Horn said that the committee had
looked at ways of carrying over part-time hours but felt it made the
system to hard to manage. Dr. Montgomery said that it works both ways
since if it carries over and the student does badly during a part-time
semester then it would count against him/her in the calculation. Motion
carried. Dr. Halligan congratulated the committee for its work.
ACADEMIC STANDARDS AND POLICY Coninued on Page2....
[ PAGE 1 ] [ Page 2 ]